Connor Tynan
Eurovision
2/25/26
How Iceland’s culture is Represented in Their 2022
Eurovision Submission
It’s not uncommon
that Eurovision performances follow the trend of being the biggest, flashiest,
and most eye‑catching. But Iceland’s 2022
entry of “Með Hækkandi Sól” by
Systur took a different route. It stood out to me because of its modest and
simplistic visual appearance. When I first watched it, the lack of stage props
and crazy visuals caught my eye right away. The stage was warmly lit, and the
only people on stage were the 3 singers. As I began to learn more about the
song, I also realized how the song sorta represents Iceland’s culture too. In
this blog post, I’m going to analyze the meaning behind the lyrics, the music,
and visuals of Iceland’s 2022 performance. I’m also going to look into how
Iceland’s performance lines up with Iceland’s own national identity.
Additionally, focusing on this performance lets me connect back to my first
blog post that covered Iceland’s national identity in relation to its geography,
sense of community, and literature.
Analyzation of Lyrics, Imagery, Music, and Performers
The most memorable
aspect of the song for me was the lyrics and singing. The song is sung
completely in Icelandic, but once you translate it, the true meaning really
comes through. My interpretation of the lyrics is that the song is about
beginning the process of healing from trauma and emotional pain. Throughout the
song, they refer to this emotional state as “winter.” The line about “icy
chains around my heart” stood out a lot to me. Those words make you think of
someone who’s stuck in emotional pain and feels held back by what they’ve been
through. But the song also mentions those “icy chains” melting away, which to
me symbolizes hope. This reflects Iceland’s storytelling tradition that often
focuses on struggle being a pathway to resilience (McDonald, 2019).
The use of
“winter” can mean a lot of things too. Winter itself tests your character and
patience. In Iceland, this could connect to the cultural relationship they have
with the land and harsh weather, which shapes daily life. On a bigger scale, it
can reflect Iceland’s values like endurance and honesty (Sühring et al., 2023;
Barraclough, 2021).
Musical Analsis
Musically, the
performance leans heavily into folk/country. The only instruments involved were
three guitars and a drummer. The vocals were accompanied by a slow and melodic
picking pattern that honestly reminded me of American folk or old‑school
country music. Even though the song has obvious non‑Icelandic
influences, it still feels unusually emotional and culturally heavy. The
minimal staging adds to the song’s serious tone. The performers were backlit
with a warm orange hue instead of pyrotechnics or LED walls. That choice makes
everything feel more personal and honestly fits Iceland’s vibe as a small and
kinda reserved nation (Barraclough, 2021).
Analyzing the Imagery
As I was watching,
I noticed the performance doesn’t use many metaphors or props on stage. It’s
way more stripped‑down than the average Eurovision performance, which in
turn makes it feel more intimate and meaningful. The lack of visual
distractions puts the emotional weight directly on the performers. Their
outfits were simple and avoided anything flashy that might distract from the
music. The camera work was close and personal, sometimes zooming straight in on
their faces. That makes the story feel more direct and emotional, while still
keeping things really grounded. The overall reserved look lines up with
Iceland’s cultural preference for modesty (Suhring, 2023).
Analyzing the Performers
Systur
describes themselves as humble, calm, and confident. All three sisters have
similar stage presence, which reinforces equality and teamwork. In an Icelandic
context, this makes sense because Iceland places a huge emphasis on equality
and being humble. Their shared vocals and even the fact that they perform as
siblings reflect the collective, mutual support that Iceland values. This
connects back to my first blog post, where I talked about Iceland’s community centered
support system (Barraclough, 2021).
How the Analysis Connects to Course Concepts.
One of the course ideas that fits
here is representation, meaning how a country decides to present itself on a
big international stage like Eurovision. Something that stood out to me was
Iceland’s choice to sing fully in Icelandic. It’s honestly kinda bold, since
most Eurovision artists switch to English to get more votes. I think Iceland
knew that but didn’t care—they wanted to represent their culture properly. This
makes the performance feel way more authentic and connected to national
identity (Barraclough, 2021).
Cosmopolitanism vs. authenticity:
Eurovision is a super cosmopolitan
event where tons of countries mix styles and cultures. Iceland participates in
that global environment, but they don’t lose their own identity in the process.
Their performance shows that you can take part in a huge international event
while still keeping your own cultural “center.” That lines up with the course
idea of mixing being open to the world (cosmopolitanism) but still being
yourself.
Avoiding pinkwashing or message‑washing:
Another concept we talked about is
how some countries use Eurovision to push political messages or clean up their
image. Iceland doesn’t do any of that here. This performance isn’t trying to
pinkwash, virtue‑signal, or push a political statement. Instead, Iceland
keeps the focus on the emotional story of the song. Honestly, that makes it
feel even more real.
Tension with folk aesthetics / cultural blending:
There’s also a small disconnect
worth mentioning. The cowboy‑ish hat and American‑style
guitar picking make the performance feel a little less Icelandic. This fits
into the concept of cultural blending (and a little bit of “artwashing”), where a country mixes its own
style with a more popular or recognizable aesthetic to stay relatable. It doesn’t ruin the performance at all, but it shows how smaller
countries sometimes balance staying true to their culture vs. appealing to a
wider audience (McDonald, 2019; Sühring, 2023).
Alignment and misalignment with Iceland’s national identity
In my first blog post, I talked about some of
the main things Icelanders see as important to who they are. Being humble,
being community centered, staying connected to nature, and being
emotionally honest are all closely held values. I think Systur’s performance does a good job at reflecting these values. The minimalistic
approach to their performance fits Iceland’s humble nature.
There’s no huge dance routine, no flashing
lights, no political statement just three women singing together like they
would in a community setting. The groups performs also gives off a strong
community vibe. They stand close together, share harmonies, and don’t try to
make one person the center of attention. This reflects how Icelander's value mutual
community support and closeness because the country has such a modest
population.
The
nature connection is also an under looked aspect of Iceland’s identity. The
lyrics use winter, cold, and sunlight as emotional symbols, and that ties
straight into Iceland’s relationship with its environment. Iceland often deals
with long, dark winters, so using that as a metaphor for emotional struggle
feels true to their identity. The emotional honesty also can be seen. The
performance isn’t trying to please everyone. it’s just them, their voices, and
the meaning of the song. That straightforward, sincere style matches what I’ve
learned about Icelandic culture.
Conclusion
In
the end, Iceland’s 2022 Eurovision performance does a good job of staying aligned
with their cultural identity. Through the use of their native language, minimalist
staging, and emotionally provoking lyrics, Systur spreads and educates the
world about Iceland cultural values. Even though the performance borrows musical
ideas from American folk/country, the performance still maintains the essence
of Icelandic national identity. Instead of going for spectacle, Iceland chose
something refreshing and different meaningful, Which reflects Iceland’s true cultural
identity.
References
Barraclough, E. R. (2021). Trees, woodlands, and forests in
Old Norse-Icelandic culture. JEGP, Journal of English and Germanic Philology,
120(3), 281–301.
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/798401
McDonald, R. (2019). RE:writing: Medial Perspectives on
Textual Culture in the Icelandic Middle Ages (Review). Parergon, 36(2),
216–217.
https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/62/article/742758/pdf
Sühring, N., Chambers, C., Koenigk, T., Kruschke, T.,
Einarsson, N., & Ogilvie, A. E. J. (2023). Effects of storms on fisheries
and aquaculture: An Icelandic case study on climate change adaptation. Arctic,
Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 55(1), 2269689.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15230430.2023.2269689
Systur. (2022). Með hækkandi sól (Iceland). Eurovision Song
Contest 2022 Turin [DVD]. Universal Music Group.
Comments
Post a Comment